Thursday, April 7, 2011

Jan Lokpal Bill - Us and Them

Like all sane and sensible citizen, I am against corruption. Thus, in principle I really do not have anything against Anna Hazare or Arvind Kejriwal and their associates and patrons. However, I have a slightly different take on these mega anti corruption waves, or more anti-politician wave that we see from time to time.


I think, as a civil society we have a found an easy scapegoat in the political class to carry all our sins. As if our pronouncement is that the politicians are a complete different species, having 24 pairs of chromosomes while normal human beings have 23 (dogs – 78, chimpanzee – 48, tomato – 24). We have conveniently ignored the fact that politicians come from the same milieu that we form and belong to. Thus as individuals and as a group, we have become outwardly critical and carping, rather than being introspective, honest and corrective.

While the big corruption of the political class is not to be absolved by any means, ignoring the small but pernicious and seeping misdemeanors of the common man (irrespective of the socio economic strata) in their day to day lives is a bigger risk. Our whole approach has become to correct the design defect of a skyscraper after it has been fully erected and inhabited. I am afraid, that is not a sensible approach, and beware, the casualties will be high.

It is well known that the various super luxury vehicles belonging to a number of Mumbai-Pune based mega industrialists regularly travel at close to 200 kmph on the good stretches of the Mumbai Pune Expressway, traumatizing, few rare drivers in the middle lane, who are trying to obey the speed limits. Where is the influence of political class in this?

Where is the politician, when people break traffic rules – cars breaking signals, stopping on zebra crossings, pedestrians crossing the road at busy junctions on foot in spite of existence of footbridge and subways, pedestrians walking on the road, in spite of some nice pavements which have come up in parts of south Mumbai? Where is the politician when the residents of a chawl dump their garbage regularly on the road, because the nearest garbage bin is 200 mtrs away? Where is the dirty scumbag politician when the paan chewing multitudes of all economic class defile the country without any remorse or second thought? Where is the politician, when the celebs who are standing next to Anna giving voice to his movement and sharing the glory, go back and pay and accept cash as compensation to avoid tax?

Educated urban middle class is the hallowed group which holds the responsibility of being honest and upholding the value system of the society. And it is this class which has taken to air travel in the last decade in a big way. So, when the air hostess announces to switch off the mobile phone, which politician exhorts the executive, the businessman, the good mother and housewife to keep chattering till the plane takes off and then again just before the wheels have touched down? Where is that scoundrel politician in this scene? Who is to be blamed when my engineer, MBA colleague says that “I prefer corruption as an efficiency tax than no action at all” ? Where is the politician when academics eulogise jugaad as our source of innovativeness?

And we expect that one severely flawed, concentrating, counter-democratic and unsuitable bill for a large country like India will solve our entire corruption problem? While the entire society goes about breaking the small rules and laws that small people can break, we believe that putting another law to stop the misdemeanors of the big and powerful will solve our problem of corruption forever? We believe that “our” corruptions, because they are minor (perhaps because we do not have the opportunity to indulge in bigger corruption or we lack the unpardonable daring and chutzpah to commit acts of big corruption) are not of any import, but the corruption of politicians are completely unconnected to the utterly debased moral fibre of the larger society and polity. If politicians were a homogeneously separate species than us, perhaps there refrain would be, “Wah Chachu, tumhara pyaar pyaar, aur hamara pyar sex?”

A society, which has misinterpreted its fundamental advice from its scripture and ignored the probity of means just to justify the goals, and such mindset, which has been exacerbated by last two decades of unbridled materialism and personal profit seeking, will continue to generate politicians, bureaucrats and corporate executives, who are nefarious, corrupt and criminal. A society which does not follow rules will get rulers who do not follow rules. A polity deserves the leaders it chooses.

Anna Hazare and Arvind Kejriwal should ponder over this and exhort their followers to look inward, and around themselves and bring about the changes at home and neighborhood first. Without that, RTI will just become a tool of self seeking motives, and such mega events of fasting, will just be flashes in the pan and festivities for the flower children.

14 comments:

  1. Very nice English. Write a good essay on 'Cow' and refrain from making your invaluable comments. Else I guess you have vested interest in writing this blog. I hope you must be tired of deleting responses.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for your comments, Kaushik. Your comments were personally hurtful and nasty. But that is another of our hallmarks. Not only are we a corrupt mileu, we cannot take self criticism and we are rude beyond all measure. And nope I have not deleted any responses so far, and will not do so, unless they are obscene or vulgar.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kaushik, your comments do deserve deletion. Someone is speaking up and all you have is comments such as these. Unnecessary and immature.

    Coming to terms, that is thoughtful. Corruption exists because we make it possible, in big and small doses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very well written . Looks like being rude and nasty has become the order of the day - a trait which was before looked down upon is now being praised.

    Hopefully it will change soon ....

    ReplyDelete
  5. extremely well written and well expressed! at the end of the day, things are not all black and white. more power to anna hazare for what he is and has been doing but all of us need to look within and reflect..instead of blindly following herd mentality and armchair activism!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Agreed...We need to reflect inwards first...does that by any mean fades the importance of the politicians(elected to take care,assumed to be one of us) to adapt the right ways...Should the demand for transparency take more than 40 year to get a response.....
    And if this lackadaisical attitude is making people anti politicians ...then I support them..and really want to find out how many chromosomes they actually have

    ReplyDelete
  7. thanks subir, very well put...not uncommon that there is a collective projection on to the politician...clearly a defense against recognizing ourselves

    ReplyDelete
  8. Little did I know or ever did I think that my pissing from the window of a stationary train in childhood (coz I could not make it to the toilet) be an example of 'corruption'. I feel Anna Hazare and his followers (me included) do think corruption to be a crime where public money is siphoned off for personal gains. And that is where politicians are in a more advantageous position than the common man. We elect them as our voice at the state and national levels and not for merrymaking!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very good thoughts. I was having the similar feeling this morning. I think almost 80% of our population is corrupt/ unruly or both. The voice of remaining 20% will soon be choked unless something is done. Any thoughts/ suggestions how to go about this?
    We run an NGO, a Cancer Hospital. We have waited more than 2 yrs to get approval from the corporation for a 4 storeyed building for poor patients, complying all the norms.Nothing has happened yet. However, we see ponds/ tanks being regularly filled up all around the hospital for new buildings without any problem!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thoughts well shared. I could elaborate on the road rage: I assume that the majority of people who drive on the roads in the cities are at the least educated up till the 10th standard. Neither their education nor the politician stops them from driving with utter disregard for everyone else. The section of "unimportant" entities made up of dead cats and dogs lying on the road (any where the accelerator can be pushed above 40 kph ) lately has become inclusive of human lives. I am dismayed by this diminished value of life.

    We greet unknown people during Diwali or celebrate together out on the streets when India wins a cricket match, but go back to cheating, carelessness, dishonesty, ill-manners and rudeness (of course only when our ego knows we can't lose).

    While one (me for example) could go out and try to be of help to the cause this good man is working for, I would be more satisfied if there are events that ask people rich and poor to introspect somewhere in order to mature and ensure that good sense and an atmosphere conducive for prosperity prevails in the society. Now of course this is on the premise of the belief that the "common man" may become a politician. And as much I agree with ansubarik on corruption, I also feel that good leaders should also ask people to work toward imbibing good values in our changing society.

    I feel good when I see respected and the influential folks coming out and doing their bit such as:
    Amitabh comes out and supports the Polio campaign.
    Aamir talks about "Atithi devo bhava"
    They make good sense here and they are giving back: asking the people to think and do good, react good.

    However, I am a pessimist in this regard and it stems even more from the growing population and the shrinking resources. Jiski lathi, uski bhains; business as usual.


    P.S.: did not mean to write this long.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with you.I guess people were just waiting to join a mini revolution. The timing was ripe & the media stoked the fire. People joined without thinking the intricacies. By the way the writing is impressive & waiting for your first book to be published. Amitava Roy

    ReplyDelete
  12. Superbly presented subir, I dare say , as usual. Good to see the powerful emotions oozing. I tend to think, though, most of us probably won't like the broader connotation of corruption . Great going dear. will wait for more . - Sanjib

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well drafted and point taken. However, in the current context, there is another way of looking at why and how corruption is embedded in our nation's psyche.

    For one, I think that the only way we can ever root out corruption is to start from the top, rather than from the bottom. It is like a filtering mechanism: if your boss is corrupt, then you are all the more likely to be the same way because you do not fear the consequences; your moral integrity is based on standards set by people who govern you. And like a chain reaction, you encourage and pass on the same disease to your peers and juniors.

    Let us take the same example you have given: people overspeeding and getting away with it. If the entire government machinery were clean and efficient, the top brass in the police would be forced to come in line because it would be suicidal to get caught redhanded indulging in corruption. When the top brass in the police becomes clean and efficent, corruption in the middle and lower ranks is slowly annihilated because one corrupt act can spoil the image of a clean police force. When the entire police force becomes clean, people who commit any kind of felony cannot get away by paying money and will be brought to book. Of course, this is a very ideal scenario and is unlikely to happen to perfection but I believe the Lok Pal can do at least something close. Contrary to what most people are saying, weeding out corruption has to start from the top and not from the bottom.

    For a moment, consider whether a peon will hesitate to take money when he knows that his officer is corrupt and would not mind his subordinate making extra money just like he does. Probably, he won't even blink an eyelid. Imagine the counter scenario now. If his officer were to be a clean no-nonsense guy, at the very least, the peon would consider the situation carefully before taking even a small sum.

    This is exactly what was happening in Hong Kong in the 1970s before the Independent Commission Against Corruption ( a setup similar to what is being mooted in the Lok Pal bill) was brought in. In fact, the current situation in India is very similar to what Hong Kong was going through in four decades ago. Today, largely because of the ICAC, Hong Kong is one of the least corrupt states in the world. We have history on our side, if not the support of the entire nation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. PCECIL,

    I would be very happy if utopia comes true. And I would like to share your youthful optimism.

    I am aware of ICAC of HongKong and ombudsman in some small countries like Scandinavian ones, and some similar laws in Singapore. I would like to point that HK and Singapore are far from democracy. In fact Lee Kuan Yew is clearly above all laws. I shudder to think if that happens here.

    Mind it, there was a time when SC judges were above all suspicion, and we managed to corrupt them. And now see what's happening about various allegations about the Bhushans. One may debunk that as politicians' conspiracy, but it is tough to find clean sleeves in this country.

    Everybody was saying that the panelist should be aploitical. I wonder who or what is apolitical? Someone who or whose family has never been in an electoral process should safely qualify as one, should he? This disqualifies both the Bhushans and Snatosh Hegde. And what about apolitical people who have political amibitions and takes lok pal as a step towards that- like "Dr." APJ Abdul Kalam (in case people do not know, he does not have an academic doctorate).

    I am kind of sick about this politican bashing of our society. And I see no good coming of it. That is the moot point of my thesis.

    It is the bottom that supplies the people to the top. So cleaning up at the top will hardly serve the purpose. It has to act both ways, if at all. And leaders, political or pseudo-political, both will have to do the unpleasant and unpopular thing; i.e. point the finger at the people.

    ReplyDelete